From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Sep 10 2:52:32 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from lion.butya.kz (butya-gw.butya.kz [194.87.112.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7EC14A10 for ; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 02:52:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bp@butya.kz) Received: from bp (helo=localhost) by lion.butya.kz with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 11PNLE-0002wo-00; Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:51:36 +0700 Date: Fri, 10 Sep 1999 16:51:36 +0700 (ALMST) From: Boris Popov To: Daniel O'Connor Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: NetWare client in -current In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Daniel O'Connor wrote: > Is there any reason to not have it as a port? > > The only possible candidate for contrib'ifying I could see would be mount_nwfs > because building it without the kernel source could be a problem, but the rest > of it could be a port I think :) Yes, that's acceptable. But mount_nwfs require libncp.so and this means that ncp library sources will be also required. So KLD, mount_nwfs and libncp should go into source tree and other utilities can be a port. Other thoughts ? -- Boris Popov http://www.butya.kz/~bp/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message