Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:16:28 +0100 From: Daniel Bye <freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> To: Free BSD Questions list <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. Message-ID: <20101001141628.GE26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTin9ZoGsUhOBwy10Y4CPFcFNFO2P-35JZXH5dER2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> <AANLkTinGA6eGB7Tvo0bOLv0aAqbOCoq_JVx-OfAHHdNV@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTin9ZoGsUhOBwy10Y4CPFcFNFO2P-35JZXH5dER2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:40:56AM -0400, Kevin Wilcox wrote:
> On 1 October 2010 05:29, krad <kraduk@gmail.com> wrote:
>=20
> > In my experiance freebsd should work fine. However I would say openbsd =
is
> > probably better suited to your needs, due to its tighter security model
> > (auditing)
>=20
> Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built
> into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is
> there something in 'audit' that is lacking?
I think krad is referring to the well-publicised code audit that the OpenBSD
project conducts, rather than the TrustedBSD audit framework. As far as I
know, OpenBSD doesn't have anything comparable, but it's a long time since I
looked at it, so I might be typing out of me ear...
Dan
--=20
Daniel Bye
_
ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
- against HTML, vCards and X
- proprietary attachments in e-mail / \
--G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD)
iEYEARECAAYFAkyl7TwACgkQixf5fBYiFmquGQCfSg3K9lGGH1CYLt5fN/25XWk0
ZX8AoKfGCJojiP81QUI8/6/8eZ468HYB
=i6Ih
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20101001141628.GE26665>