From owner-cvs-all Mon Jul 26 9:42:46 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E43514CAC; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 09:42:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA12882; Mon, 26 Jul 1999 18:42:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from des) To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Brian Somers , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/net if_tun.c References: From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 26 Jul 1999 18:42:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: Alfred Perlstein's message of "Mon, 26 Jul 1999 12:32:01 -0400 (EDT)" Message-ID: Lines: 17 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Alfred Perlstein writes: > On Mon, 26 Jul 1999, Brian Somers wrote: > > brian 1999/07/26 05:11:11 PDT > > Log: > > Don't complain if 0 bytes are written to the tun device, simply > > do nothing. > can you MFC this, there's no point in having current's and > stable's API differ? Can you guarantee that it doesn't break anything? (BTW, this is semantics, not API, and I can think of a zillion other ways in which the semantics of -CURRENT differ from those of -STABLE) DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message