From owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 31 05:52:06 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7DC416A4CE for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:52:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from xaqua.tel.fer.hr (xaqua.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2876943FAF for ; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:52:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from zec@tel.fer.hr) Received: by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix, from userid 20006) id 9BF589B64A; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:53:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from marko-tp.zavod.tel.fer.hr (marko-tp.zavod.tel.fer.hr [161.53.19.48]) by xaqua.tel.fer.hr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC9A9B648; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:53:51 +0100 (CET) From: Marko Zec To: Dan Pelleg , Brad Karp Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:51:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 References: <20031030145714.E6C1643FB1@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310311451.30848.zec@tel.fer.hr> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on xaqua.tel.fer.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60 X-Sanitizer: Advosys mail filter cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "deeper sleep mode" support in -STABLE? X-BeenThere: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Mobile computing with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:52:06 -0000 On Thursday 30 October 2003 16:55, Dan Pelleg wrote: > Brad Karp writes: > The patch applies, but not cleanly, and doesn't compile. Marko > told me in personal mail he's planning to work on -STABLE > support. OK, the patch against 4.9-R can be found at http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/pm/ Be warned that I didn't have time yet to upgrade my ThinkPad to 4.9, so I couldn't test the patch myself, but it should work at least on ICH-3 based machines. On ICH-4 ones (which I believe ThinkPad X31 is based on) the speedstep sysctl control will be useless, since Pentium-M processors use a different clock control methods. Deeper sleep support should work in all cases... Good luck, Marko