From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 20 06:31:03 2007
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489B916A41F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:31:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org)
Received: from kientzle.com (h-66-166-149-50.snvacaid.covad.net
	[66.166.149.50])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2553A13C465
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:31:03 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org)
Received: from [10.0.0.222] (p54.kientzle.com [66.166.149.54])
	by kientzle.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id l5K6FAH7024229;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org)
Message-ID: <4678C5EE.7050402@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 23:15:10 -0700
From: Tim Kientzle <kientzle@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20060422
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su>
References: <20070618202758.GA16711@comp.chem.msu.su>	<4676FD4F.3030302@rcn.com>	<20070618225134.GA18473@owl.midgard.homeip.net>
	<20070619141545.GB29685@comp.chem.msu.su>
In-Reply-To: <20070619141545.GB29685@comp.chem.msu.su>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Gary Corcoran <gcorcoran@rcn.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fts(3) patch for review
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 06:31:03 -0000

>>>>- for things that should be at least 64 bits wide, use long long
>>>> and not int64_t, as the latter is an optional type.
>>>
>>>Isn't "long long" a gcc-ism, whereas int64's are portable....
>>
>>'long long' is part of C99 and was widely supported by many compilers even
>>before C99 was approved.  int64_t is also part of C99. ....
> 
> ... the only mandatory <stdint.h> types are intmax_t and uintmax_t while
> all the [u]intN_t types are declared optional by C99.

So why not use intmax_t?

Tim Kientzle