From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 03:09:56 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B0CC16A401 for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimimeister@gmail.com) Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B3DD13C45A for ; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kimimeister@gmail.com) Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 50so29687wra for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:09:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UxrE+inNdWckshfhnAGeN8LwfIM2jw21vTK+K7bmOCCwY1baFpdvbEJXCqQjCIfI3gLLjfbpuK8nXrK43mC1SwAcesLVEcG/C3/Q1piazcayS+tuQIGlKmFpLzuy55VtLRE+GozwS3Xi3edrLcXqbBn1IzJfoPpKDfRQ//61s/M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TnmQ2HH6LXop3t1EtAYktbqiV2iH0dPy/18M5rmWGYI1YlxPt3DBBF9evCvldfjSwKtZF9rUtdIRjSCMwoi6u7deC/l9UkV3ZOnEt+TZFTxbfD7euVc4plQkXXJLIFvSOEzg0t8O+7pSa1/Cj8hZ8xZT2tNbHNszuWC6WVDjl0c= Received: by 10.115.61.1 with SMTP id o1mr69225wak.1176260994469; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.160.20 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42b497160704102009k4ec95bf2sf894a4c805631488@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 04:09:54 +0100 From: "Kimi Ostro" To: "Jonathan Horne" In-Reply-To: <200704081139.00313.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200704081139.00313.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bind9 in a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 03:09:56 -0000 On 08/04/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > i was setting up bind9 today in 2 jails. 1 jails is the master, and the > other > the slave. i am reloading 2 machines that were previously physical > machines, > into these jails. the master went fine, both internal and external views > work as expected. > > setting up the slave, was not so smooth. i recovered my named.conf from > backup, and then removed the external portion of the zones (i dont feel like > messing with trouble invovlved with setting up the 2nd ip on the jail). > over > the past few days while i was setting this up, the master was already in > operation, and has had several edits to a few zones. when i reloaded the > slave versions from backup into my new slave, and started named, the slaved > did not update their zonefiles to match the new serial numbers. i fixed > this by stopping named, deleting the zone files, and restarting it again. > thankfully, the slave zones all instantly populated, creating matching > serial > numbers to the ones that are running on the master. > > do master-to-slave transfers work as expected in a jail, or did i just see > some abnormal behavior (possibly due to me not waiting long enough for > transfer to happen on its own)? > > thanks, > -- > Jonathan Horne > http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org > freebsd@dfwlp.com Its an error in your config, as running BIND works perfectly fine under a jail in Master/Slave config for me. Without seeing config, cant really help or maybe better on the BIND mailing list? HTH, -- Kimi