From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Apr  4 17:23:23 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id RAA14382
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 17:23:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.burlco.lib.nj.us (mail.burlco.lib.nj.us [204.91.160.99])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA14373
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 17:23:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (rcummins@localhost)
	by mail.burlco.lib.nj.us (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id UAA00878;
	Fri, 4 Apr 1997 20:22:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 1997 20:22:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Ray Cummins <rcummins@mail.burlco.lib.nj.us>
To: dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
cc: Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>, hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2.1R NFS and FTP load problem FOUND
In-Reply-To: <3.0.32.19970404174607.00aa89a4@etinc.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.3.95.970404202111.864B-100000@mail.burlco.lib.nj.us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 4 Apr 1997, dennis wrote:

> I then remembered that I had noticed that 2.2R was a bit clunky with
>  8 meg of ram, so I popped in another 8 meg, and the problems
> disappeared. So, it seems, ftp and nfs loads cant be done on at
> 8 meg system.
> 

Hm, I upgraded to 2.2.1-RELEASE from 2.1.0-RELEASE with no problems on a
Dell 486sx-20 w/ 8MB RAM, using NFS.