Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:42:45 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 214400] ports/head/base/binutils (r421584) targeting powerpc64: cross build failed for lack of finding a "gcc" command Message-ID: <bug-214400-13-MuWDLim3Jt@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-214400-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-214400-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214400 Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hardware|powerpc |Any --- Comment #11 from Mark Millard <markmi@dsl-only.net> --- May be setting the Hardware to Any instead of to the target of the cross build would help avoid confusions for this bugzilla report against ports/head/base/binutils . So I'm changing that. I'm guessing that listing amd64 (the execution environment for my example cross build) would also be confusing. That is why I picked Any. I'll also note that via various workarounds in order to find other problems at later stages I also submitted 214401 through 214405 against: ports/head/base/* materials and what they produce. These too might be confusing for base/binutils and base/gcc references that are actually for: ports/head/base/binutils ports/head/base/gcc --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-214400-13-MuWDLim3Jt>