From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Jun 20 16:41:08 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA02406 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 16:41:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (awfulhak.demon.co.uk [158.152.17.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA02389 for ; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 16:40:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from awfulhak.demon.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by awfulhak.demon.co.uk (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA27405; Fri, 20 Jun 1997 23:39:10 +0100 (BST) Message-Id: <199706202239.XAA27405@awfulhak.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96 To: Greg Haa cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Samba 1.9.16 and Freebsd 2.2.2 In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Jun 1997 11:57:55 PDT." <33AAD2B3.446B9B3D@z-axis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 20 Jun 1997 23:39:10 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I have three file servers running FreeBSD 2.2.2 with samba 1.9.16p11 > serving a > win 95 network. What happens is this. Samba seems to be really slow in > giving the > needed files to the win95 boxes even over 100 megabit. We have tried > compiling > different versions of samba but they are all slow. We tested samba on > linux and it > is much quicker than freebsd. So we tried using the smb.conf file from > linux but > that did not help. We tried lots of different options with samba in the > .conf file > and some things worked better than others but it still does not work > properly. > If you could give some insight into the problem it would be greatly > appreciated. Putting "socket options = TCP_NODELAY" at the top of smb.conf worked nicely for me (not in a section, just at the top of the file on its own). > Greg Haa > greg@z-axis.com -- Brian , Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour....