From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Sep  6 12:18:41 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37E09431
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 12:18:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B79A61F25
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  6 Sep 2014 12:18:40 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id b17so15507077lan.27
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=3VnDqRGAXNa7Eg4Vm3e7LTSiHMbjERVcxY383L92JQ4=;
 b=NGGe+QtHpnYhDlkNRMAPO4Qw3n4wQQ+4ZSiGyI689C7UrE1ebpKfK7frxzXO1raL/5
 7Hyd7Bx+imw103QgQu8y4z26JMx5SAoBNUw4od+7i1/wTiYApykEuWKBiy0qS4YKNDRR
 iDhDA3v67zWXUgGHTX307z532wd0FwualXMCIv7a7Qc1tL1l6stwKH0aO+tYS2ozWocI
 0GJ8+6YUiqcfc+qak+gH8+UVHViziILyTUNXFENVM+Gys7M6MU/pK0gy4CI5fz8f27ju
 VjHysI5RSFozozoTnBFXxaVhnpZRdU2a0tSB+jSsa2YqrZSy+0skcsV19oh45Rrh3S9m
 B8mA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.153.4.39 with SMTP id cb7mr17400069lad.19.1410005918693;
 Sat, 06 Sep 2014 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.114.229.225 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Sep 2014 05:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2014 16:18:38 +0400
Message-ID: <CAA9ksCb4g1vZ36vcRerKa3=diNyAsQFh3f-fcbCX3E+5xNqrWg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: About Freebsd port net/ntopng
From: Fedor Dikarev <fedor.dikarev@gmail.com>
To: Muhammad Moinur Rahman <5u623l20@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.18-1
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2014 12:18:41 -0000

Hello Muhammad Moinur Rahman!

I've found that you are maintainer of net/ntopng freebsd port.
I've tried to build ntopng and found that it's marked as BROKEN. So I
started to analyse what's broken and find right URL for distfiles. And also
I've made some patches so now it can be build without gcc (I had build
successfully using clang on FreeBSD 10).
And today while I try to reproduce all of this I found that ntopng 1.2.1
was released just few hours ago.

So what your opinion, what will be better: should I send patches to you and
there will be net/ntopng11 in ports or upgrade net/ntopng to 1.2.1 is just
enough?

-- 
Fedor Dikarev