From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Apr 5 17:00:58 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA05752 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 17:00:58 -0700 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA05744 ; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 17:00:57 -0700 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id RAA10247; Wed, 5 Apr 1995 17:00:42 -0700 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199504060000.RAA10247@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: lsof 3.25 now available for fbsd 2.0 To: gary@palmer.demon.co.uk (Gary Palmer) Date: Wed, 5 Apr 1995 17:00:42 -0700 (PDT) Cc: mbarkah@slate.Mines.Colorado.EDU, asami@forgery.cs.berkeley.edu, ports@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <2480.797125821@palmer.demon.co.uk> from "Gary Palmer" at Apr 6, 95 00:50:21 am Content-Type: text Content-Length: 682 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > In message <9504052316.AA99715@slate.Mines.Colorado.EDU>, Ade Barkah writes: > >Please let me know if you encounter any problems. > > Any chance you could look at it on a -current machine and figure out why > it doesn't work? It won't even compile... > > I think Poul-H's namecache improvements mean that what works on 2.0 will > crash on current... There should be no reason to look in the name-cache, and doing so is virtually impossible anyway, so I take it that you just guess wildly... :-) -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'