From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Jun  1 11:09:53 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9D81065675
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:09:53 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com)
Received: from fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com
	[69.55.229.149])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B9E38FC12
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  1 Jun 2012 11:09:52 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [192.168.15.220] (unknown [118.175.84.92])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by fss.sandiego.ateamservers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B0A8EB9F22; 
	Fri,  1 Jun 2012 07:09:51 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4FC8A303.1040906@ateamsystems.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 18:09:55 +0700
From: Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com>
Organization: A-Team Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
	rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jason Leschnik <leschnik@gmail.com>
References: <C480320C-0CD9-4B61-8AFB-37085C820AB7@FreeBSD.org>
	<4FC779C0.7020801@ohlste.in> <4FC77EAD.1090900@my.gd>
	<4FC78A94.8070008@ohlste.in> <4FC79136.6000205@my.gd>
	<4FC7B4CC.1070507@FreeBSD.org> <4FC87A60.3020102@my.gd>
	<4FC88827.8020003@FreeBSD.org> <4FC89726.2010601@lavabit.com>
	<CAN1XHtdcFJuVXWON6DVseKDY98WoE2D3VXbrBZaYWgWv56wYOA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAN1XHtdcFJuVXWON6DVseKDY98WoE2D3VXbrBZaYWgWv56wYOA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: Katinka <katinka@lavabit.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Are You Using FreeBSD?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2012 11:09:53 -0000

On 6/1/2012 18:03, Jason Leschnik wrote:
> I may be totally incorrect with my above ideas, but it's what i would
> like to see from FreeBSD *again*... This is the reason in the first
> place most people used FreeBSD, stability/scalability/performance are
> the hallmarks of FreeBSD. If we have these hard hitting numbers
> released frequently it gives the dev team a good indication of how
> changes reflect on performance.

This is a good point and the kind of stuff that would make a, for=20
example, great Slashdot post once finished.

Of course there would be arguments but I think it would be good=20
exposure.  It certainly would be nice to have a place to point to these=20
things vs. just saying "its more better and stabler", too.  And if its=20
not at least its acknowledged so it can be fixed.