From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org  Mon Dec 14 18:22:40 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99049A14FAA
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8894313D7
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:22:40 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id tBEIMerY006404
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:22:40 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 205161] cad/qcad: install error due to conflict with
 archivers/quazip
Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:22:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-qa
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: New
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-205161-13-Oid1EApxeJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-205161-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-205161-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2015 18:22:40 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=205161

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marino@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #1 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
ALL you are doing is stating a fact.  Clearly, I can infer you think this is
wrong, but I don't know what you think is correct.

For example,
Are you saying there should be a CONFLICTS set?

Or are you saying that the conflict should be resolved so both ports can be
installed?  If the latter, how do you propose that happens?  Also, which
maintainer should be responsible since there are two involved?

Is there a patch coming?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.