From owner-freebsd-current Wed Sep 30 10:39:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA10780 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:39:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from relay.nuxi.com (nuxi.cs.ucdavis.edu [128.120.56.38]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA10775 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:38:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by relay.nuxi.com (8.8.8/8.6.12) id KAA03656; Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:38:33 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <19980930103833.A3648@nuxi.com> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:38:33 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Doug White Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: potential UFS kernel problem Reply-To: obrien@NUXI.com References: <19980930005330.A1326@nuxi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: ; from Doug White on Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 10:33:07AM -0700 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2.7-STABLE Organization: The NUXI BSD group X-PGP-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Keyid: 34F9F9D5 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'd be careful playing with procfs, things may depend on it in unusual > ways. But removing msdosfs and cd9660 shouldn't impact ufs. But nothing should depend on procfs until LKMs can be loaded. Otherwise the procfs LKM is useless. -- -- David (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu -or- obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message