Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Sep 1998 10:38:33 -0700
From:      "David O'Brien" <obrien@NUXI.com>
To:        Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc:        freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: potential UFS kernel problem
Message-ID:  <19980930103833.A3648@nuxi.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9809301028080.10660-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>; from Doug White on Wed, Sep 30, 1998 at 10:33:07AM -0700
References:  <19980930005330.A1326@nuxi.com> <Pine.BSF.4.03.9809301028080.10660-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> I'd be careful playing with procfs, things may depend on it in unusual
> ways.  But removing msdosfs and cd9660 shouldn't impact ufs.

But nothing should depend on procfs until LKMs can be loaded.  Otherwise
the procfs LKM is useless.
 
-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.ucdavis.edu  -or-  obrien@FreeBSD.org)

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19980930103833.A3648>