From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 12 08:55:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 126C51065745 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe05.swip.net [212.247.154.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794F88FC19 for ; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=5OBHFxb9I47YZ7HELXzI6cL6pwPTRnd5uxbD1DPQ4WY= c=1 sm=1 a=WrOSKJTHxIAA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=CL8lFSKtTFcA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:17 a=NzkW3RTSaLTf7hCE9sEA:9 a=ioilf2Ov2yRrbH5r_ihfYaVGlCYA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=i9M/sDlu2rpZ9XS819oYzg==:117 Received: from [188.126.198.129] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe05.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 47547891; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:55:01 +0100 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 09:56:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <06D5F9F6F655AD4C92E28B662F7F853E039E389A@seaxch09.desktop.isilon.com> In-Reply-To: <06D5F9F6F655AD4C92E28B662F7F853E039E389A@seaxch09.desktop.isilon.com> X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA: hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201011120956.04501.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Matthew Fleming Subject: Re: sleep bug in taskqueue(9) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 08:55:04 -0000 On Thursday 29 April 2010 01:59:58 Matthew Fleming wrote: > It looks to me like taskqueue_drain(taskqueue_thread, foo) will not > correctly detect whether or not a task is currently running. The check > is against a field in the taskqueue struct, but for the taskqueue_thread > queue with more than one thread, multiple threads can simultaneously be > running a task, thus stomping over the tq_running field. > > I have not seen any problem with the code as-is in actual use, so this > is purely an inspection bug. > > The following patch should fix the problem. Because it changes the size > of struct task I'm not sure if it would be suitable for MFC. > 1) The u_char is going to leave a hole in that structure on ARM platforms for example. 2) The existing taskqueue implementation also has a missing check for the pending count wrapping to zero. I.E. it should stick at 0xFFFF and not wrap to 0. --HPS