From owner-svn-ports-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 6 07:00:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1660A394; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from shepard.synsport.net (mail.synsport.com [208.69.230.148]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD00695C; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 07:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.22] (unknown [130.255.19.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shepard.synsport.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1C4438BD; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 02:00:34 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <54323E01.4080109@marino.st> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 09:00:17 +0200 From: John Marino Reply-To: marino@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrej Zverev , John Marino Subject: Re: svn commit: r370131 - in head/net-mgmt: . nagios-check_dhcp.pl References: <201410052140.s95LeUa9030114@svn.freebsd.org> <54323187.7040603@marino.st> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "svn-ports-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-ports-all@freebsd.org" , Bartek Rutkowski , "ports-committers@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 07:00:54 -0000 On 10/6/2014 08:34, Andrej Zverev wrote: > Hello John, > > I don't see why shebangfix can't handle space. > _SHEBANG_REINPLACE_ARGS+= -e > "1s|^\#![[:space:]]*${${lang}_OLD_CMD}|\#!${${lang}_CMD}|" Actually I only took the other person's word that it didn't work when he responded to "why didn't you use shebangfix?". I don't know if he was mistaken or maybe shebangfix has been improved in the meantime. > Even if it can't you can make some handwork to obey framework instead of > making one more way of doing this :-) i essentially agree with you. > But anyway, what about LOCALBASE and shebangfix? I think they can be > fixed. If you prefer I can provide patch. Please don't get my email as > something bad, If something can be done better so why not. I didn't take it as bad. I didn't respond to LOCALBASE because I thought it was valid and I left that to robak to answer. Probably both LOCALBASE and SHEBANGFIX should be tweaked IMO. John