From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Aug 10 11:35:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA05298 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 11:35:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from x22 (ppp1671.on.sympatico.ca [206.172.249.135]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA05287 for ; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 11:35:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (tim@localhost) by x22 (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id OAA00359; Sun, 10 Aug 1997 14:34:07 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 10 Aug 1997 14:34:06 -0400 (EDT) From: Tim Vanderhoek Reply-To: ac199@hwcn.org To: "Pedro Giffuni S," cc: hoek@hwcn.org, Brandon Gillespie , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: why bother submitting anything (via send-pr) In-Reply-To: <33EE236C.5FCB@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Sun, 10 Aug 1997, Pedro Giffuni S, wrote: > Tim Vanderhoek wrote: > > > > It might help to Cc the original pr to the person who (should) be > > responsible. Any reason for a follow-up can also remind someone > > of the pr, too. :-) > > It is not always clear who is responsible, specially if you are not a > developer..:-(. CVS logs are publicly available and show who the last person to touch a given piece of code is. By the Law of CyberSpace, the last person to touch a piece of code is responsible. :-) Of course, that doesn't mean they _are_ responsible... It just means they _should be_... ;-) -- tIM...HOEk OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names hoping that the resultant code will run faster.