From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri May 25 16:59:58 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 236E316A421 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 16:59:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DB313C455 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 16:59:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fj@panix.com) Received: from panix5.panix.com (panix5.panix.com [166.84.1.5]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 665C113A9B2 for ; Fri, 25 May 2007 12:59:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from fj@localhost) by panix5.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id l4PGxv023347 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 25 May 2007 12:59:57 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 12:59:57 -0400 From: Joe Altman To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20070525165957.GA12407@panix.com> Mail-Followup-To: Joe Altman , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20070525150929.GA25582@panix.com> <200705251630.l4PGU0YF091446@lurza.secnetix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200705251630.l4PGU0YF091446@lurza.secnetix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Cc: Subject: Re: atapicam cd error X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 May 2007 16:59:58 -0000 On Fri, May 25, 2007 at 06:30:00PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: > Joe Altman wrote: > > You have atapicam as a kernel module; and what version of atapi-cam.c? > > No, I've always compiled it statically in my kernel. That's what I meant to say; that it was a device in the kernel: device atapicam > > It looks like this one is current: Revision 1.54 > > That's the HEAD version (in 7-current). Yes, I realized it was something like that after I reviewed the handbook. > By the way, I am _not_ using k3b or any other krap. ;-) k3b sounds like something under KDE; but ISTM that neither Grip nor XMMS are crap. Also in my experience, if atapicam is a kernel device, the Plextor I have is completely useless. Without atapicam as a device, the Plextor works for a variety of tasks. I wonder if atapi-cam.c interacts, in my setup and in some way, with some other kernel device and so makes it appear that atapicam is the source of the problem? -- If it's The Pumpking Smashins, what time is it?