From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 29 05:40:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6578F106566B for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E478FC0A for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m6T5e4q4088803 for ; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m6T5e4EA088801; Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:40:04 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:40:04 GMT Message-Id: <200807290540.m6T5e4EA088801@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Nate Eldredge Cc: Subject: Re: bin/125185: csh(1) exit on signal 11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Nate Eldredge List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 05:40:04 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/125185; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Nate Eldredge To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, 666.root@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: bin/125185: csh(1) exit on signal 11 Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:35:31 -0700 (PDT) FWIW, I ran the test at http://berlin.ccc.de/~packet/fork_test.c, modifying it to malloc() 10 MB first, to make it have about the same size as a csh process. On my 1.8 GHz amd64 running 7.0-RELEASE I get measured fork time: 251396 nsecs measured vfork time: 243734 nsecs a difference of about 3%. So the penalty for switching back to fork() instead of vfork() wouldn't be very much, and this is certainly the simplest fix -- a one-byte patch :) Thoughts? -- Nate Eldredge neldredge@math.ucsd.edu