From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Apr  5 10:43:39 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9660E37B7E9; Wed,  5 Apr 2000 10:43:35 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6])
	by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA97194;
	Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:43:31 -0600 (MDT)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id LAA80005; Wed, 5 Apr 2000 11:42:45 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <200004051742.LAA80005@harmony.village.org>
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: How stable is the ATA code? 
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, lioux@uol.com.br
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Apr 2000 13:30:00 EDT."
		<200004051730.NAA02597@server.baldwin.cx> 
References: <200004051730.NAA02597@server.baldwin.cx>  
Date: Wed, 05 Apr 2000 11:42:45 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <200004051730.NAA02597@server.baldwin.cx> John Baldwin writes:
: Perhaps the 82C586x is the problem child?  Note that the -B chip is the power
: management chip. :)

So are you having problems?  It may also be FIC mobo, of which we've
had such glowing reviews of late (after glow from being roasted :-).

Maybe I should moderate the UPDATING entry I made?

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message