Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 17:39:42 +0900 From: Koichiro Iwao <meta@FreeBSD.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org> Cc: ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r493835 - in head/security: . softether softether-devel softether5 softether5/files Message-ID: <20190225083942.s6ztddtlcznt32ed@icepick.vmeta.jp> In-Reply-To: <20190225074259.GA53023@FreeBSD.org> References: <201902250507.x1P5796L092763@repo.freebsd.org> <20190225074259.GA53023@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 25, 2019 at 07:42:59AM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Looks like it should've been repocopied, but it was added as a new > port instead, why? Honestly, I forgot to do that. Usually when adding another version of existing software, it should be repocopied but I have a plausible excuse not doing repocopy. Upstream has separate trees. I created softether5 port and its upstream is here: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN/tags You'll see 4.x versions are not tagged there. 4.x versions can be found here: https://www.softether-download.com/files/softether/ softether{,-devel} ports fetches from here. Alternatively, they can be fetched from Github: https://github.com/SoftEtherVPN/SoftEtherVPN_Stable However SoftEther 4 and 5 are radically the same software and interoperable each other. This is only an execuse, indeed I should have done repocopy. Sorry about that. -- meta <meta@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20190225083942.s6ztddtlcznt32ed>