From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 22:54:23 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625D416A4BF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:54:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx.nsu.ru (mx.nsu.ru [212.192.164.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E799743FBF; Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:54:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: from mail by mx.nsu.ru with drweb-scanned (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19vW4L-0002Br-00; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 12:57:09 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru ([193.124.210.26]) by mx.nsu.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19vW4K-00027R-00; Sat, 06 Sep 2003 12:57:08 +0700 Received: from regency.nsu.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h865tsvt073640; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:55:55 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from danfe@regency.nsu.ru) Received: (from danfe@localhost) by regency.nsu.ru (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h865tr62073562; Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:55:53 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:55:53 +0700 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Marcel Moolenaar Message-ID: <20030906055552.GA72373@regency.nsu.ru> References: <42548.1062488547@critter.freebsd.dk> <20030902004917.S6074@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <3F58B8B7.30107@tcoip.com.br> <20030905110128.Y8003@znfgre.qbhto.arg> <20030905183127.GA849@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030905183127.GA849@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Envelope-To: src-committers@freebsd.org, DougB@freebsd.org, phk@phk.freebsd.dk, cvs-all@freebsd.org, dcs@tcoip.com.br, cvs-src@freebsd.org, marcel@xcllnt.net cc: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: Doug Barton cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" cc: src-committers@freebsd.org cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/rescue/rescue Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Sep 2003 05:54:23 -0000 On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:31:27AM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > On Fri, Sep 05, 2003 at 11:05:09AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > > > So this consensus isn't at all all that consensual. > > > > "Consensus" does not mean "Universal Agreement." > > It does mean "general agreement", so if you don't take universal > literally then for all practical purposes it does mean universal > agreement. This is also the crux: we never formally agreed on > anything, because we cannot deal with the consequence: which is > to unify all knobs. So, the only understanding we reached was that > we have slightly more separatists than we have consolidators. But > as long as we don't unify the usage of the existing knobs, this > topic will be repeated ad nauseam. > > Since I'm not going to change the knobs, I cannot force an outcome. Methinks overall-acceptable practice would be renaming all to NO_FOO scheme, leaving NOFOO compatibility glue code for knobs we have to keep compatibility with lengthly. All new ones, obviously, should go under NO_FOO policy. Just my $.02. ./danfe