From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 11 21:15:29 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5737E7FE
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-qc0-x236.google.com (mail-qc0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com",
 Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 192B72759
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f182.google.com with SMTP id m20so586261qcx.27
 for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
 :cc:content-type;
 bh=vDTxGOGbWh/sy4rFyqU1nUMgIsQqgrcU+hkxKTFrnII=;
 b=0Q1uv46NcBbVhlDPXfcvQi8nBSzKb7erLr99t0Ia5lXxBwNwth9QHi0d+7pLlDsRlx
 o8SUzDC45j/cv2+RBLXog6TGQYGQWGISHdMDIyCLCVr6nO5h0oHw9MBy7ldeOQIXoEEE
 +eMJ5ZtC41oqVCRypoNvhiIgNgaXHqsRGkdA68e/O7JdcLPAWm03j40iLLGM8IsihY/Y
 8IdUps2z5JQQdlH6o/nw5x42zL0t2S+p0IwLTX5iYa958KA8FhKF+1o1BX0kGkdzvnth
 fjW3zPQXIYCK2kpVTKnJg25pBsfYrNtaXdzKUcRNz0+RD0x5PZ08UhLDrGpZP4aeWKq3
 Gthw==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.140.25.166 with SMTP id 35mr26001471qgt.103.1402521328173;
 Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.96.73.39 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:28 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAM72HBbeB_2Hg1uwhUs51NDrJH-TDYUjKDFPoiHSNc0=-67YPQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAB5=vGZ3zgFf4xHyFdxwe=su_sjXHNT_gS55xAo3bnzmSS_t1w@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAM72HBbeB_2Hg1uwhUs51NDrJH-TDYUjKDFPoiHSNc0=-67YPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 14:15:28 -0700
Message-ID: <CALCpEUFC_iPF=uP9xn41Rrt8N85ev3JbhNSVJQtdX0G+c9ve1w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: dedicate the most available cpu cores to my application
From: hiren panchasara <hiren.panchasara@gmail.com>
To: Nick Sivo <nick@ycombinator.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc: Mahdi Dashtbozorgi <mdasht@gmail.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2014 21:15:29 -0000

On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 1:16 PM, Nick Sivo <nick@ycombinator.com> wrote:
> I'd actually like to do the opposite of this, and have run into the
> same problem.
>
> cpuset -s 1 -l 0
> cpuset: setaffinity: Resource deadlock avoided

I see the same problem on -CURRENT.

fwiw, a fix is being discussed and worked on:
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers/2014-June/045292.html

I am going to try and apply the proposed patch
https://phabric.freebsd.org/D141 to see how it behaves.

cheers,
Hiren