From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Aug 24 15: 0:54 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389D737B424 for ; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 15:00:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AB5471C72; Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:00:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2000 18:00:51 -0400 From: Bill Fumerola To: blaine Cc: "Gooderum, Mark" , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: nuking "unsafe" protocols (was Re: Upcoming rc.conf changes not loading certain currently loaded daemons) Message-ID: <20000824180051.D57333@jade.chc-chimes.com> References: <251BF6012D6B4A49A4109B1C3289A7B5BB78@purgatory.jumpweb.com> <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: <39A59992.F42F03EC@denverweb.net>; from blaine@denverweb.net on Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:54:26PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Aug 24, 2000 at 03:54:26PM -0600, blaine wrote: > Umm, why not just use openbsd if security is the primary concern? Because no operating system overcomes stupidity. If you do insecure things, you have an insecure machine. If you do secure things, you'll have a reasonably secure machine. People put too much stock in marketing. -- Bill Fumerola - Network Architect, BOFH / Chimes, Inc. billf@chimesnet.com / billf@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message