Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 16:04:37 -0600 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org, Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number Message-ID: <20061102220437.GD74928@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru> References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <20061102115058.GB10961@rambler-co.ru> <Pine.GSO.4.64.0611020824150.12236@sea.ntplx.net> <20061102140948.GA70915@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <20061102182419.GC774@rambler-co.ru> <454A60E9.7020303@FreeBSD.org> <20061102214157.GC2028@rambler-co.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Nov 03, 2006 at 12:41:57AM +0300, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 01:19:37PM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > > Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > >On Thu, Nov 02, 2006 at 08:09:48AM -0600, Brooks Davis wrote: > > >Hmm, bumping not versioned libraries *now* and not bumping them > > >again at pre-release would work, but doing it without also bumping > > >"to be versioned" libraries is IMO pointless. And if we bump all > > >of them now, we'll have to bump some of them again when versioning > > >is turned on by default. > >=20 > > No, we will not have to do it. Why would we? It's -CURRENT, so that=20 > > nobody really cares about backward/forward compatibility within that br= anch. > >=20 > I'd very much like NOT to have to recompile all of my installed > ports on my -CURRENT boxes the day we turn on symbol versioning, > and that will require the shlib major bump of those libs that > will provide symbol versioning. If we do the bump now, we'll > have to do it again later, and that's slightly against the rule > that we only bump them once inside a branch. Does that rule still matter since the new rule with symbol versioning will be that we don't bump them. Period. (at least for libraries we control)? -- Brooks --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFSmt0XY6L6fI4GtQRAl9nAJ9G/xGMS6O5I49t3VgHvooQ9CvtLQCgh58F zQEbFp+ymU6m6gUZRrynRzY= =Bnwc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iVCmgExH7+hIHJ1A--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061102220437.GD74928>