From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 28 02:09:20 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D77D106564A; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:09:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from mail.xcllnt.net (mail.xcllnt.net [70.36.220.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D885D8FC0C; Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sa-nc-common-207.static.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.xcllnt.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9S29995010533 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:09:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1251.1) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Marcel Moolenaar In-Reply-To: <1319721247.41652.16.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 19:09:09 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <201110271307.p9RD7nAx007728@svn.freebsd.org> <1319721247.41652.16.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> To: Ken Smith X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1251.1) Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r226835 - in head/sys: amd64/conf i386/conf ia64/conf pc98/conf powerpc/conf sparc64/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 02:09:20 -0000 On Oct 27, 2011, at 6:14 AM, Ken Smith wrote: > > In response to one of my commits done to the ia64 GENERIC I received > some feedback giving a long list of issues (style, formatting, seemingly > gratuitous differences, annoyances, etc.) with the whole set of GENERIC > config files. If anyone knows a reason I should NOT act on the list > to bring all the GENERIC's into style compliance and whatnot let me > know. If nobody screams I'll do what I can to fix them up in head > some time after 9.0 is finished. If you're doing this in response to a private email, I very much object if this is done without a review. I would really hate to see a lot of churn on the stable branch after RC1 for no reason. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar marcel@xcllnt.net