From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 4 21:36:33 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3B616A40F for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from anuket.mj.niksun.com (gwnew.niksun.com [65.115.46.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A7B813C448 for ; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 21:36:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from niksun.com (anuket [10.70.0.5]) by anuket.mj.niksun.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l04LaHj4039795; Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:36:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) From: Jung-uk Kim To: Greg Lewis Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 16:36:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <200701032114.27607.jkim@FreeBSD.org> <20070104210613.GA27174@misty.eyesbeyond.com> In-Reply-To: <20070104210613.GA27174@misty.eyesbeyond.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200701041636.14874.jkim@FreeBSD.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88.6/2413/Thu Jan 4 04:46:27 2007 on anuket.mj.niksun.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Linux JDK 1.6 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2007 21:36:33 -0000 On Thursday 04 January 2007 04:06 pm, Greg Lewis wrote: > On Wed, Jan 03, 2007 at 09:14:16PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > FYI, I made a port for linux-sun-jdk16: > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/linux-sun-jdk16-port.tar.gz > > Thanks, Jung-uk! > > > Just copied it from ports/java/linux-sun-jdk15 and modified... > > But it doesn't seem to be stable for me on amd64 with -CURRENT. > > :-( Maybe it is another "linux-o-lator breakage", dunno... > > Have you tried on i386? Nope. > If not I can give it a try on 6.x. Please do. > The JDKs have traditionally been hard on the Linuxulator, so its not > surprising for it to be having problems. Yeah. That's my feeling, too. Maybe linuxulator/i386 has better luck. Jung-uk Kim