From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Aug 29 08:17:57 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCDD16A4DA
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:17:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz
	(nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz [195.122.204.152])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B575043D46
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:17:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nat-application.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id
	k7T8HqXp049665; Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:17:52 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id k7T8HpSM049664;
	Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:17:51 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org
	using -f
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: Lapo Luchini <lapo@lapo.it>
In-Reply-To: <44F3E8A0.90009@lapo.it>
References: <200608281346.k7SDkcLa016804@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<44F3E8A0.90009@lapo.it>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-9hX3z3sV47jUGfL0Xorj"
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 10:17:51 +0200
Message-Id: <1156839471.40076.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.6.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/102439: port upgrade: devel/monotone 0.29
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 08:17:57 -0000


--=-9hX3z3sV47jUGfL0Xorj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Lapo Luchini p=ED=B9e v =FAt 29. 08. 2006 v 09:11 +0200:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Committed, thanks!
> >
> > PS I wasn't quite sure, what the unexec constructions in PLIST_FILES wa=
s ment
> > to achieve, so I got rid of it.

> It was meant to get rid of $PREFIX/share/zsh/site-functions directory
> for people that don't use shells/zsh, while people that do use zsh
> should have that directory (empty or not).
> (it was inspired by similiar lines from sysutils/portupgrade/pkg-plist)

I'm not sure it would work. Probably it wouldn't.

Right now, monotone port will kill the site-functions directory if user
got zsh installed. You would need to depend on zsh port to be sure
there's some directory structure precreated...

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

Squish. Larger than the normal icky things, and twice as icky.

--=-9hX3z3sV47jUGfL0Xorj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBE8/gvntdYP8FOsoIRAtPsAJ9yNGANzZj5SKCK6vn1VOg2FWF9QQCfUf0o
a39lD5n59dl5buCeMRmTT4E=
=Z2Ex
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-9hX3z3sV47jUGfL0Xorj--