From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 21 19:31:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6535B16A4CE; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:31:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D259F43D53; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:31:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from clint@0lsen.net) Received: from 0lsen.net ([24.20.127.157]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <20050121193108016006pd0ee>; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:31:09 +0000 Received: by 0lsen.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 25A2D17ABA; Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:31:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:31:08 -0800 From: Clint Olsen To: Andrey Chernov , Joerg Wunsch , current@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20050121193108.GC70592@0lsen.net> References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120215807.GA70629@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120221154.GC70629@nagual.pp.ru> <20050121150709.GA60180@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050121192622.GA19150@nagual.pp.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050121192622.GA19150@nagual.pp.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: NULlsen Network X-Disclaimer: Mutt Bites! Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Implementation errors in strtol() X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 19:31:10 -0000 On Jan 21, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Already fixed in the first commit as part of testing. Second commit fixes > style problems. The question is, was it really a style problem or a gcc problem? The comp.lang.c folks might suggest the latter. Whining about missing extraneous parentheses encourages people to write code to shut up gcc, not necessarily good code. -Clint