Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2005 11:31:08 -0800 From: Clint Olsen <clint@0lsen.net> To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>, Joerg Wunsch <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, bde@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [patch] Re: Implementation errors in strtol() Message-ID: <20050121193108.GC70592@0lsen.net> In-Reply-To: <20050121192622.GA19150@nagual.pp.ru> References: <20050120192324.GA30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120205501.GA69123@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120211449.GC30862@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050120214406.GA70088@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120215807.GA70629@nagual.pp.ru> <20050120221154.GC70629@nagual.pp.ru> <20050121150709.GA60180@uriah.heep.sax.de> <20050121192622.GA19150@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jan 21, Andrey Chernov wrote: > Already fixed in the first commit as part of testing. Second commit fixes > style problems. The question is, was it really a style problem or a gcc problem? The comp.lang.c folks might suggest the latter. Whining about missing extraneous parentheses encourages people to write code to shut up gcc, not necessarily good code. -Clint
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050121193108.GC70592>