From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jul 8 03:15:11 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA21670 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 8 Jul 1998 03:15:11 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.144.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id DAA21652 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 1998 03:15:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.8.5/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA23559; Wed, 8 Jul 1998 03:15:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 1998 03:15:04 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Patrick Gardella cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Slowest system for ip aliasing In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 Jul 1998, Patrick Gardella wrote: > I am considering moving the IP masquerading from my box to a dedicated box. > It's sole purpose would be the IP masquerading. As simple as possible. > > What would be the minimum requirements to route the packets to a 10 machine > LAN from iijppp on a dedicated 56K line? We are using 10Base-T networking. > Could a '386 handle it? Should just fine. Doug White | University of Oregon Internet: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | Residence Networking Assistant http://gladstone.uoregon.edu/~dwhite | Computer Science Major To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message