From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 23 03:18:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id DAA16913 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:18:34 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from implode.root.com (implode.root.com [198.145.90.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id DAA16908 for ; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:18:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id DAA29056; Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:20:49 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199710231020.DAA29056@implode.root.com> To: Donald Acton , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, acton@vn.opentext.com Subject: Re: 2.2.5-RELEASE > 64Megabyte generates kernel panic In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Oct 1997 02:01:24 PDT." <199710230901.CAA28576@implode.root.com> From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Thu, 23 Oct 1997 03:20:48 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >>ASUS P2L97 AGP Motherboard with 128Mbytes of 10ns SDRAM DIMMS in 64MB modules >>266MHz Pentium II > > I had a variety of problems with using 2 SDRAM DIMMs here and I eventually >had to replace them with regular SIMMs (the motherboard I had supported both). >The problems were similar to what you are seeing, although the exact fairly ^^^^^^ "failure" >was random. I've heard that SDRAM compatibility is a big problem, and because >of this, many vendors have special (no)return policies specifically for SDRAM. ...sorry about that - time for bed. :-) -DG David Greenman Core-team/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project