From owner-freebsd-newbies Tue Jun 29 19:24:59 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-newbies@freebsd.org Received: from fellspt.charm.net (fellspt.charm.net [199.0.70.29]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C172214E13 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 19:24:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dutch@charm.net) Received: from charm.net (coretel-031.charm.net [209.143.116.31]) by fellspt.charm.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA07893 for ; Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:24:55 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <37797FE3.B2294C2B@charm.net> Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 22:24:35 -0400 From: Dutch Collins X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Kernel Reentrancy - NT vs Linux Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-newbies@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If anyone is tasked to evaluate an OS for server applications you may want to check this out. I was not aware that Linux Kernel code was not reentrant. Well 'they' say it is fixed in 2.2, but it isn't. Now I have to find more info on the BSD kernel. Study? Where except the code? NT is better by 600% http://www.microsoft.com/ntserver/nts/exec/compares/ntlinux.asp Why Linux failed. http://www.ntmag.com/Magazine/Article.cfm?ArticleID=5048 -dutch -- +------------------------------------------------------+ | If you want to make god laugh - tell him your plans. | | Kim Basinger | | Voice Line: 410.922.5805 | +------------------------------------------------------+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-newbies" in the body of the message