From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 17 18:38:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2ED316A4CE for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:38:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from makeworld.com (makeworld.com [198.92.228.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ABC243D48 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:38:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from racerx@makeworld.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.com [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA316130 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:38:37 -0600 (CST) Received: from makeworld.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (makeworld.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79135-09 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:38:35 -0600 (CST) Received: by makeworld.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 108F16129; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:38:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by makeworld.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F016122 for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:38:35 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 12:38:34 -0600 (CST) From: RacerX To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr> Message-ID: <20050217123730.O79252@makeworld.com> References: <9C4E897FB284BF4DBC9C0DC42FB34617641B03@mvaexch01.acuson.com> <128456842.20050217185105@wanadoo.fr> <2810734464.20050217192707@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by ClamAV 0.75.1/amavisd-new-2.2.1 (20041222) at makeworld.com - Isn't it ironic Subject: Re: SPAM: Score 3.7: Re: Instead of freebsd. com, why not... X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2005 18:38:38 -0000 On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Anthony Atkielski wrote: > RacerX writes: > >> That is a very harsh statement ... > > It's a very realistic statement. > >> Now that you have made it; show us the proof that you base your reply >> on. > > I've explained it at length on many previous occasions. > >> Show us the urls that says what you said. > > Why are URLs more reliable than what I say? What about URLs on my own > site? > >> Show us the white papers that state what you have stated. > > Why are whitepapers more reliable than what I say? What if I'm the > author of the whitepaper? > > -- > Anthony > Then show us your proof - I do. I have a section on my site dedicated to FBSD as a desktop using various versions from 2.2.1 on up to 5.3-RC