From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 22 19:34:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C60937B401; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 19:34:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dallben (pcp529856pcs.nash01.tn.comcast.net [68.52.131.181]) by mtaout04.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0GY5009DU0HHKN@mtaout04.icomcast.net>; Sat, 22 Jun 2002 22:34:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2002 21:34:28 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" Subject: Re: FreeBSD NFS server benchmarks vs. OpenBSD, NetBSD? In-reply-to: <20020622192803.B20405@dragon.nuxi.com> X-X-Sender: bandix@dallben.homeportal.2wire.net To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Cc: Matt Simerson , hackers@freebsd.org, Dan Ellard Message-id: <20020622213320.J3524-100000@dallben.homeportal.2wire.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 22 Jun 2002, David O'Brien wrote: >Actually Matt Jacob has some NFS testsuites that makes FreeBSD servers >blow chunks. Solaris still is the most robust NFS server of the general >purpose UNIXes. I'm quite happy with the performance of my SGI machines as NFS servers. They're quite robust in my experience. I'd love to find some time to beat up on them a bit and compare my results to Slowlaris and FreeBSD. Brandon D. Valentine -- http://www.geekpunk.net bandix@geekpunk.net ++[>++++++<-]>[<++++++>-]<.>++++[>+++++<-]>[<+++++>-]<+.+++++++..++ +.>>+++++[<++++++>-]<++.<<+++++++++++++++.>.+++.------.--------.>+. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message