From owner-freebsd-python@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 11:53:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: python@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F38E640; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:53:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x232.google.com (mail-ie0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1B8FCF7; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:53:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f178.google.com with SMTP id c13so4214977ieb.37 for ; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 03:53:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b9oMQ97xTYokA3rQ8vz7wlO2Rl1R7EEC28Ot4nNPmhc=; b=LyZkbiMulgApUkD2mghcxnJvx9D1KYpfuPJ+wtto8XM5zDThn+54WcS3OE54HxkgRD neWyJwkZ5XTWQBSnA6kxMJ9mxzWX4g1ZNu7kJwG1Cm31xm4rRaJgIaanVLCCnVxrwk8E YyJ47dF1DyG5rlqz7Gt3kEMaWIAMT8pUWqgqbOYr7K5G2fA18jYDheInLgBdD8wq/znN l3pjvDK2V5LCywDEVtjF6auLTYjyUwcv0+4rrU33jfozs4Ghvac1YXv+kCwSQazyDGq5 Ifz041nHa2Qshu2WJm15s26jJi5fa6wBDTZ7hUeUULgvera4wZjafhBy/IIHTHwlh60C SdDg== X-Received: by 10.50.152.132 with SMTP id uy4mr1145819igb.62.1359806001676; Sat, 02 Feb 2013 03:53:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.16.73 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 03:52:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 11:52:51 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Fwd: python33-3.3.0_2 failed on amd64 9.1-glib] To: Dmitry Sivachenko Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Li-Wen Hsu , python X-BeenThere: freebsd-python@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Python issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 11:53:22 -0000 On 2 February 2013 11:29, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: > > On 02.02.2013, at 15:28, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 1 February 2013 18:51, Dmitry Sivachenko wrote: >>> Upgrade to 9-STABLE and it will package correctly. >>> >>> See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=243331 >> >> That's great, and I understand that ports are only guaranteed to work >> on -stable etc... but don't you think that broken on latest release is >> unacceptable? > > > Before the release, I asked re@ to MFC this change to 9.1-RELEASE. > They decided it is not necessary, so the answer is: it is acceptable. Hm, thanks-- I'll bring it up with them. Chris