From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 03:46:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24ECA16A4CE; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:46:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from chiark.greenend.org.uk (chiark.greenend.org.uk [193.201.200.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CDE43D2F; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 03:46:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fanf@chiark.greenend.org.uk) Received: by chiark.greenend.org.uk (Debian Exim 3.35 #1) with local id 1AqWLs-0000vQ-00; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:46:52 +0000 To: andre@freebsd.org From: Tony Finch In-Reply-To: <4028B68F.41DB11FD@freebsd.org> References: Message-Id: Sender: Tony Finch Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:46:52 +0000 cc: Danny Braniss cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TTCP/RFC1644 problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 11:46:54 -0000 Andre Oppermann wrote: > >Linux never will. They consider TTCP broken by design. [...] >The problem is that TTCP will never make it mainstream or even >little side stream. FreeBSD is the only BSD implementing it. The reason for its lack of popularity is that it has significant security problems. http://tcp-impl.grc.nasa.gov/tcp-impl/list/archive/1292.html Tony. -- f.a.n.finch http://dotat.at/ SOUTH UTSIRE: SOUTHERLY OR SOUTHWESTERLY 4 OR 5, OCCASIONALLY 6 AT FIRST, BECOMING CYCLONIC FOR A TIME. OCCASIONAL RAIN. MODERATE OR GOOD.