From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jul 25 15:18:56 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from odin.activeisp.com (odin.activeisp.com [213.188.133.110]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E0137B980 for ; Tue, 25 Jul 2000 15:18:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kenneth@karoliussen.net) Received: from kekar (kekar.activeisp.com [213.188.133.26]) by odin.activeisp.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA22297; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:18:32 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <089001bff686$59cd2390$1a85bcd5@kekar.dhs.org> From: "Kenneth Karoliussen" To: "Jason C. Wells" Cc: , "odin" References: Subject: Re: Aliased network interface Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 00:19:08 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >FreeBSD does not have the eth0:0 semantics. No, the semantic I used was just simply for the illustrution, and yes it was actually taken from Linux ;-) > >Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire >192.168.1 link#1 UC fxp0 => >192.168.1.200/32 link#1 UC fxp0 => > >These two entries are for the same interface. There are multiple entries >in the routing table. But you will not be able to show a foreign host that your packages originated from an alias IP address attached to the single network interface, right? You're able to do so in a Linux system by creating a true alias network interface. > >The difference is the cosmetics of the display. That or I am smoking >crack. Gee, I really hope not ;-D /Kenneth To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message