From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jan  6 00:50:49 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA17571
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 00:50:49 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.19])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id AAA17543
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 6 Jan 1998 00:50:28 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA05876;
	Tue, 6 Jan 1998 19:47:35 +1100
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 1998 19:47:35 +1100
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199801060847.TAA05876@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: andreas@klemm.gtn.com, jkh@time.cdrom.com
Subject: Re: LINT is missing examples for sio1-3 ? GENERIC does so
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> > OK, but the proposed change just copied lines from GENERIC to give
>> > uninteresting differences in the port, irq and disable flag.
>> 
>> OK Andreas, make them more interesting! :-)
>
>Should I add a hat option ? Is that interesting enough ? ;-)
>
>I would suggest to comment that entries out just to let it be
>an example. Ok ?

No.  LINT already has too much documentation that belongs in man pages.
The sio man page actually already has examples for the 4 standard ports.

Bruce