From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Aug 10 20:26:52 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA22474 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 20:26:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from brooklyn.slack.net (brooklyn.slack.net [206.41.21.102]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA22464 for ; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 20:26:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from pfm@brooklyn.slack.net) Received: from localhost (pfm@localhost) by brooklyn.slack.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id XAA25114; Mon, 10 Aug 1998 23:33:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 10 Aug 1998 23:33:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Patrick McAndrew To: Greg Lehey cc: John Baldwin , FreeBSD Hackers , John Baldwin , dg@root.com Subject: Re: AMD-specific kernel code (was: How long a wait?) In-Reply-To: <19980810123341.X11095@freebie.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 10 Aug 1998, Greg Lehey wrote: > On Sunday, 9 August 1998 at 23:00:24 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > >>> I just looked at the patch. Other than some KNF style bugs, it seems > >>> okay. > >>> I don't have any AMD K5/K6 machines, however, so I can't test it and won't > >>> be committing it. I missed the first part of this thread, is this patch for AMD K6 processors (does it utilitze their RISC core (or whatever it is))? Where can i get info and the patch? How stable is it? ================================================== Patrick McAndrew, Nashua, NH pfm@slack.net CES, Inc. XNS, Inc. FreeBSD, NetBSD, Unixware 7, Solaris 2.5 "I'd change the world, but I don't have the source code" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message