Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:28:38 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: imp@bsdimp.com Cc: vkashyap@FreeBSD.org, nork@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, gibbs@FreeBSD.org, mark_salyzyn@adaptec.com Subject: Re: aha(4) doesn't depend on cam(4). Message-ID: <20060325142838.20c2288f.nork@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <44237873.7020102@samsco.org> References: <20060324011416.acd8df42.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060324013616.1b6f66ac.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork@FreeBSD.org> <20060323.104913.122061815.imp@bsdimp.com> <44237873.7020102@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Warner! Thanks for your commit! On Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:41:23 -0700 Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> wrote: > M. Warner Losh wrote: > > In message: <20060324014047.95ffc1e3.nork@FreeBSD.org> > > Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@freebsd.org> writes: > > : Hi aha(4) maintainers! > > : I have a patch for aha(4). > > Actually, I'm the aha maintainer. > > Why is this needed? Is it because aha references symbols that would > > otherwise be undefined? > I think what he wants is to have cam.ko load when aha.ko is loaded (I'm > taking a leap here in that I haven't checked to see if aha.ko exists). > It's a harmless patch anyways, not sure why there needs to be an > argument about it. HI Scott, thank you. I have reported about sym.ko. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037056.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037065.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037067.html http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037071.html This problem are in many drivers depended on cam(4). I'll submit to fix this problem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060325142838.20c2288f.nork>