From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 24 09:43:02 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B452116A4CF for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:43:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from raven.ravenbrook.com (raven.ravenbrook.com [193.82.131.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C52C43D39 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:43:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com) Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (thrush.ravenbrook.com [193.112.141.145]) by raven.ravenbrook.com (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j0O9gwuo089007 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:42:58 GMT (envelope-from nb@ravenbrook.com) Received: from thrush.ravenbrook.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j0O9gwrB035318 for ; Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:42:58 GMT (envelope-from nb@thrush.ravenbrook.com) From: Nick Barnes To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20050124000032.8308@mail.net-virtual.com> from "Net Virtual Mailing Lists" of "Sun, 23 Jan 2005 16:00:32 -0800" Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:42:58 +0000 Message-ID: <35317.1106559778@thrush.ravenbrook.com> Sender: nb@ravenbrook.com Subject: Re: NIC card problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2005 09:43:02 -0000 At 2005-01-24 00:00:32+0000, "Net Virtual Mailing Lists" writes: > Hello Stefan (and everyone else!), > > Thank you for your great comments! I think I have a 3c9xx card around > here somewhere, I will give that a shot when it reboots the next time > (just to see). It looks like for future systems I'll standardize on the > Intel fxp-based cards, I really appreciate that advice! A last piece of advice: get real EtherExpress cards. A number of Intel motherboards come with onboard Ethernet interfaces (maybe they all do now), which the fxp driver understands, but the performance of such interfaces is reputed to be much lower. Nick Barnes