From owner-freebsd-hackers  Fri Jun  2 22:06:48 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA27856
          for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 22:06:48 -0700
Received: from mail.id.net (kilroy.id.net [152.160.9.10])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA27848
          for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Jun 1995 22:06:42 -0700
Received: from hades.id.net (hades.id.net [152.160.9.12]) by mail.id.net (8.6.8/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA24922; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 01:06:36 -0400
From: Robert Shady <rls@kilroy.id.net>
Received: (rls@localhost) by hades.id.net (8.6.11/8.6.6) id JAA02922; Sat, 3 Jun 1995 09:08:30 -0400
Message-Id: <199506031308.JAA02922@hades.id.net>
Subject: Re: A performance mystery
To: henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu (Charles Henrich)
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 1995 09:08:30 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199506030459.VAA27174@freefall.cdrom.com> from "Charles Henrich" at Jun 3, 95 00:59:13 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Length: 611       
Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > IOZONE performance measurements:
> >         1915685 bytes/second for writing the file
> >     18199013 bytes/second for reading the file
> >
> > >     16      8192    3360694             2890287
> >
> > Ding... very low memory bandwidth :-(.  Makes for a very slow
> > compile :-(
> 
> Here is the results of the iozone, as ram-speed showed as well, the memory
> bandwidth is very good:
> 
>         2684354 bytes/second for writing the file
>         14412641 bytes/second for reading the file

I missed the original message, but I'm guessing this is to an MFS mounted
files system?  Or what..

	-- Rob