From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 11 17:45:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7403716A4CE; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:45:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from connectmail.carleton.ca (connectmail.carleton.ca [134.117.2.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316C143D1F; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:45:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adamw@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.105] ([134.117.145.25]) by connectmail.carleton.ca (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.02 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTPSA id <0IES004TSMND3S@connectmail.carleton.ca>; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:45:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 13:46:08 -0400 From: Adam Weinberger In-reply-to: <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost> To: Dan Langille Message-id: <425AB7E0.2030101@FreeBSD.org> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en-ca, en-gb, en-us, en User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-CA; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050105 Thunderbird/1.0 OMFG PANTS References: <425A32C8.30080.1710F6F5@localhost> <425A3579.2138.171B7898@localhost> cc: Ion-Mihai Tetcu cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: "David E. O'Brien" cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/gzip Makefile ports/archivers/ucl Makefile ports/archivers/lzop Makefile ports/archivers/cabext X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 17:45:14 -0000 Dan Langille wrote: > On 11 Apr 2005 at 15:23, Ion-Mihai Tetcu wrote: > > >>On Mon, 11 Apr 2005 08:18:16 -0400 >>"Dan Langille" wrote: >> >> >>>On 11 Apr 2005 at 8:04, David E. O'Brien wrote: >>> >>> >>>>obrien 2005-04-11 08:04:41 UTC >>>> >>>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>>FreshPorts tells me that these ports were broken by this commit: >> >> [ ... ] >> >>Next time I won't bother to make a list then :) >> >>flz has fixed a few, but pav suggest that the obrien might want to >>back-out the commit so he won't fix more of them until obrien decides. > > > FreshPorts does a sanity check for each port in a commit. Any > failures are emailed to the comitter if the comitter opts in. To opt > in, register using your @FreeBSD.org email address at > http://www.freshports.org/ > > Is there any value in making sanity test failures publicly available? I believe emphatically that the sanity tests should be non-optional. The FreshPorts sanity checks have never been wrong for me... I personally think that every FreshPorts sanity check failure should be automatically sent to both the committer and the ports@ mailing list. If the committer doesn't wish to receive those emails, he can either (a) stop making bad commits, or (b) add a procmail filter. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx