From nobody Tue Sep 19 21:23:33 2023 X-Original-To: fs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4Rqvm61CKfz4t0g3 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rqvm56lRtz3dHc for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1695158613; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gOzs4Qze12PdElPOC8Nk8bBwNbBrLEfafWuj4gnpZgJAGMDvACaktJafL8O1CvudJwv55l fKDq3+QnUv5egJVDaAlZzrhKt9UUFGZvfNzk4iLNPqY3/v0V44vxHjAieojTJgR8AkYtCw T1U5QJjxMVbCZM2c8We/5beDvMOzMNdsm4mOfPyZhRAgODh37EQOTOAoVvZa70011EgUqK IEg9WbiiT2n0M4flnOWBKNVBOIg5lUsp0JdT+b86FMYKo0JgNNINGZfAW59h2lns/I4QM3 doYQwlvXo6JqoEKx0XP5CMzRvYledeMBTPipHZpR+eGgAW5uasbQV9XmkAr8Zw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1695158613; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=txROLJ9+lY58wa5thL4I53kzE6ixHspxmEmbATmstn0=; b=lIx30bvdUJ8EbOaI9IoJKzbCDFozkumtgSPyadmSlQfomrWvsDdDzoNW6bR4GsLgYdA714 2I/FsCEd7VG7cKjEwrdNec6q5nw8yb0XT9Z02vhIUUJsIBk4EMaK/Hc4A7B4Fzn757Iek0 aA1CKV+t/5uTsidNx7sXpbMbQjt7N/qTdn0lfllI1X6fLz3OKCxgQDrSTYxObSIxW+D+AQ V/AWpghhn/tsn1QBvPX01SBP6gPos2dke9mVeOU+Ht2siyEX0MitaIfvhZhfnT+JZVpEvb RdeN4+FZyaUfJuKn+sA6nvSMwwqyqTsHMQk+Jq6zDHV1MWhzpHOuGrJbRUSbcA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Rqvm55pknzVFM for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 38JLNXkc050700 for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:23:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 38JLNXED050699 for fs@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:23:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: fs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 273942] fusefs(5): read operation changes ctime on FUSE filesystems Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2023 21:23:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: jfc@mit.edu X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: fs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Filesystems List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-fs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-fs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D273942 --- Comment #8 from John F. Carr --- (In reply to Alan Somers from comment #7) It is apparently the responsibility of each VFS implementation to update ct= ime in response to a utimes() call. In devfs_setattr there is a call to vfs_timestamp. In ufs_setattr there is an invocation of UFS_INODE_SET_FLAG= . I don't see anything in fuse_vnop_setattr() that would update ctime when a program calls utimes(). Is there a spec saying whether it is or is not the responsibility of the fusefs server program to do it? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=