Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 21:54:02 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Kaya Saman <kayasaman@gmail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com>, portmgr-feedback@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports which are currently marked broken Message-ID: <20120622025402.GB2608@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CAPj0R5KXivo=d7RDPm7i%2BMuxUB8uh753k6LQDL45=Q6%2B222qmQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <201206210828.q5L8SrdL078006@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> <201206211201.q5LC1a5k099714@fire.js.berklix.net> <CAPj0R5KXivo=d7RDPm7i%2BMuxUB8uh753k6LQDL45=Q6%2B222qmQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 01:10:47PM +0100, Kaya Saman wrote: > Is this only for "Ports" which don't build or "Ports" which have other > issues?? You'll have to consult each port to see its message, but the vast majority are marked that way because the do not build properly, or deinstall properly, on the package building cluster. In general, if a port builds and deinstalls cleanly, and only fails in certain circumstances, it will not be marked with the BROKEN tag. Here are a couple of useful URLs with which to look at the state of an individual port, using www/apache22 as an example: http://www.freshports.org/www/apache22/ http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=www&portname=apache22 Here is a URL for all the ports currently marked BROKEN (as evaluated on i386-9): http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portsconcordanceforbroken.py mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120622025402.GB2608>