From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue May 20 13:50:17 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C4B0337B401; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpout.mac.com (smtpout.mac.com [17.250.248.86])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2D10943F75; Tue, 20 May 2003 13:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from leimy2k@mac.com)
Received: from webmail03.mac.com (webmail03-en1 [10.13.11.145])
	by smtpout.mac.com (Xserve/MantshX 2.0) with ESMTP id h4KKoG0x015475;
	Tue, 20 May 2003 13:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail03 (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by webmail03.mac.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h4KKoGsX025286;
	Tue, 20 May 2003 13:50:16 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <109711.1053463816401.JavaMail.leimy2k@mac.com>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:50:16 -0500
From: David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com>
To: David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: re@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Error in todo for 5.2 RELEASE?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 20:50:18 -0000

 CRAP!  I meant to send this to re@freebsd.org.

Sorry for the extra unnecessary traffic.

Dave
On Tuesday, May 20, 2003, at 03:48PM, David Leimbach <leimy2k@mac.com> wrote:

>Sorry if this has been brought up before but the following text is a bit confusing:
>
>"Move ATA comments into requests, so that they can be
> linked together, centralize request queue management
> permitting direct DMA of ATA commands. These 
> architectural changes will also facilitate complete
> MP-safety of the ATA driver suite, and dramatically
> improve support for Promise RAID controllers."
>
>Should this be ATA *commands*?  
>
>Sounds like a neat idea if it is :).
>
>Dave
>_______________________________________________
>freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
>