From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Nov 21 08:40:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61051C4D5FF for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E524BD9 for ; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F1D4B1AAF001; Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:40:21 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Piwik 2.17.1 To: Matthias Fechner , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <84ade84c-d3f7-a8ec-0e56-11c8fe33a968@fechner.net> <5d5053e5-4f3b-bbb8-cf37-3f274b46f278@toco-domains.de> <964b2267-4a43-7014-619f-a7fa73f54b6f@fechner.net> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <8bdcee8e-2858-c972-d700-ef89aa855dce@toco-domains.de> Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 09:40:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <964b2267-4a43-7014-619f-a7fa73f54b6f@fechner.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 08:40:24 -0000 On 20.11.2016 17:48, Matthias Fechner wrote: >> It was already assigned to and processed by me. And a second ago >> committed. :) > > sry, was maybe to fast here :) Yes. ;) >> Can you please elaborate on this? I couldn't find any hints for a >> security issue. Or do you mean critical in sense of "fix critical bugs"? > > tested your new version and works perfectly fine! > Thanks for the new version. You skipped my question. Last time you created the impression that the PR is a "critical update". But nor do i saw any critical notes neither did you state anything about that. Please be careful with such statements! Greetings, Torsten