From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 15 15:32:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFEB916A4DE for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:32:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from people.fsn.hu (people.fsn.hu [195.228.252.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA9743D7E for ; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:32:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bra@fsn.hu) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAEAD8445C; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:32:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from people.fsn.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (people.fsn.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 69923-06; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:31:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [192.168.2.3]) by people.fsn.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5900184454; Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:31:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <44E1E8E4.8010307@fsn.hu> Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 17:31:48 +0200 From: Attila Nagy User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060731) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brian Candler References: <200608141555.k7EFthXw092647@lurza.secnetix.de> <44E0C450.8050602@fsn.hu> <20060815122533.GB89848@uk.tiscali.com> <44E1C1C4.5030407@fsn.hu> <20060815144717.GB90256@uk.tiscali.com> In-Reply-To: <20060815144717.GB90256@uk.tiscali.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at fsn.hu Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Redundant/failover NFS servers - stale NFS file handle X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 15:32:11 -0000 On 08/15/06 16:47, Brian Candler wrote: > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 02:44:52PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote: >>>> I can solve this problem with Linux >>> How? >> With a shared filesystem of course. > Specifically, which one? If there is a good filesystem for this application > perhaps it could be ported. Any of them would do for read only shares. For read write ones, lock coherence would be the major issue I think. Specifically having OCFS2 or GFS would be as cool as having ZFS for FreeBSD. :) -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6758 http://www.fsn.hu/